Teaching with online discussion
Learning outcomes: participants will be able to use the BSCW
software to take part in discussion, and start their own
discussion spaces with students.1. Background
| Types of online learning, | |
| Online functions needed, | |
| CMC Technology at Keele |
| Types of tasks | |
| Differences online and face-to-face | |
| Potential benefits | |
| Potential problems | |
| Design issues |
![]()
| online learning, e-learning
includes various uses of online information, tutorials, quizzes, simulations | |||||||
| person-to-person: computer
mediated communications (CMC) between students and teachers | |||||||
varied forms: media,
synchronicity, access
|
| access to learning resources, web space (Keele learning server) | |||||||
| course administration, recording, student records, key skills | |||||||
| computer assisted assessment, testing, quizzes | |||||||
| CMC for discussion - environments
for structured collections of messages by a group | |||||||
| virtual learning environments,
e.g. Blackboard, integrate these in
one web based environment, but
|
| email: personal, course list aliases | |
| email lists: e.g. announce | |
| usenet: Keele newsgroups e.g. keele.classics.poets | |
| public web-based discussion off campus e.g. Smartgroups, public BSCW | |
| the Keele BSCW
pilot service |
![]()
| catch-up |
![]()
| Discussion groups | |
| Debates | |
| Simulations, cases, games | |
| Role plays | |
| Online portfolios | |
| Brainstorming | |
| Delphi technique for consensus | |
| Group projects | |
| Working groups and plenary | |
| Visiting experts |
| Tutor's control | |
| Scheduling meeting, discussion | |
| Attendance, absence, rejoining | |
| Mode of communication | |
| Physical vs. virtual meeting | |
| Timing, scheduling | |
| Parallel issues, tasks | |
| Group dynamics | |
| Accessing other groups | |
| Giving feedback on work | |
| Supports group work | |
| More room for misunderstanding | |
| Explicit tasks needed | |
| Gender and minorities | |
| Novelty |
(based on CSALT report, address below)
| Interactive but flexible use unlike f2f | |
| Promotes active engagement with well designed tasks | |
| Aids reflective deep learning, with time available | |
| Permanent record can assess discussion with an audit trail | |
| Opportunities for group work | |
| Social interaction | |
| Ease of accessing web resources | |
| Democratisation of teacher-learner relationship | |
| Improved access for minority
groups, shy, part time, working students |
| Flexibility for staff e.g. no
need to duplicate messages to individuals - one message is available to all - e.g. frequently asked questions | |
| Can use 'free' learning support
from other students, if you encourage it | |
| Practice writing skills |
| Lack of expressive richness, e.g. emoticons | |
| Lack of immediacy, difficulty turn-taking | |
| Information overload | |
| Prolongs decision making | |
| Requires technical access and skills | |
| Requires writing style, skills | |
| Absent 'lurkers' not participating | |
| Mix of levels of discourse | |
| Depersonalising, analytical, judgemental | |
| Needs shared goals and tasks to sustain | |
| Teachers need new skills,
extensions of f2f skills discussions need managing - 'moderating' | |
| Students need netiquette, ground rules | |
| Teacher' s time commitment limit teaching but require student time |
Group size, optimum depends on
| |||||||||
Construction of discussion space
| |||||||||
Scheduling
| |||||||||
| To assess or not to assess? | |||||||||
How much intervention from the
tutor?
| |||||||||
| Your educational values and
theories will influence your
design and management online. (See Lancaster model for details, from the CSALT web site below)
|

From CSALT, Lancaster report: Effective networked learning in higher education: notes and guidelinesJanuary 31st, 2001 http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/jisc/
![]()
either go into the Using
BSCW for teaching folder and
contribute to the discussions there
or start your own discussion:
- go to the main workshop folder and enter the folder named make your own folder and make a own new folder with your name on it
- start a new discussion in it
- look at other people's folders and respond to their discussions
- look at how you could invite new members to your folder (members of the workshop folder will be automatically members of your folder within it unless you exclude them). You may not be able to actually invite new people to register with BSCW until given access rights to do so.
| Effective networked learning in higher education: notes and guidelines, January 31st, 2001 http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/jisc/advice.htm | |
| browse http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/cs/Stephen_Bostock/keywords/cooperative.html |
![]()
|